I believe I do have a grasp on rhetoric, and writing rhetorically, but I know that my writing doesn't show this. I was capable of building rhetorical arguments, but on the fourth paper I completely missed the audience, and as a result, the focus of the paper, which only acts as evidence against my writing ability. However I feel most of my writing have strong core arguments, and for the most part are clear enough to understand. As evidence of this In paper four I formed a rhetorically effective argument, but completely missed the audience intended.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14v4FTjMN2BmSDw1hCqqmlGQZZJ5qLvMUcHiTTwfyBy4/edit#
However I feel that some oversights in my writing do not necessarily mean a lack in ability on my part. With a little more attention to detail I think I can craft a writing to my intended audience.
While I do believe I can write at atleast a college english level, I do not feel, given my performance, my grade deserves to be raised.
(I'm also writing this portfolio blind. Since my outline for it is locked in my dorm.)
No comments:
Post a Comment